Benefit from our jBPM experience
camunda was committer in the open source process Engine JBoss jBPM from the very beginning and helped customers using it right since jBPM 2 already. We trained a lot of people in using jBPM 3, jBPM 4 and consult for jBPM 5 as well. But currently the more interesting question than “how can we successfully use jBPM in our project” gets “which open source Process Engine is the right one for me?”. camunda for examples invests quite some effort in the Open Source Process Engine Activiti, and not jBPM any more. But technically Activiti is the successor of jBPM 4, whereas jBPM 5 is the successor of DroolsFlow. Sounds complicated? Unfortunately it really is. There are a lot of technical differences as well as differences in the vision around BPM or Business-IT-Alignment. Not to forget political or religious fights.
To give some guidance in that jungle we offer our consulting services, to help you in making a decision suited to your situation. We can for example explain you:
- why we would recommend not to use jBPM 4 at all,
- when Activiti might be the better choice than jBPM 5 and when not,
- that Drools integration is not an argument in either direction,
- if Bonitasoft is an interesting player in the Open Source BPM market as well
- and much more…
With our practical experience in BPM projects, our focus on BPM and Business-IT-Alignment and our long history with Open Source Process Engines we she some new light into that discussion in your project as well.
Migration from jBPM 3 to jBPM 5 or Activiti is another topic of big interest. Together with pilot customers we already worked in that direction and developed for example an abstraction layer and a step by step approach to migrate to a new engine by using BPMN models which are independent of the concrete engine. For more details check for exmaple the following pages:
- Abstracting the Process Engine
- Using BPMN 2.0 Models with jBPM 3 – A migration path and more
- The technical camunda fox documentation
Your consultants
|
Our consultants have extensive project experience in the field of BPM, Java and Java Enterprise. Beside developing solutions, they are committers in the Activiti and jBPM project and have well-founded in-depth know-how of the engine interns. They profit from their firsthand background knowledge and their experience from user projects. |
Publications (excerpt)
| Erschienen | Autor | Titel & Link | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07-2010 | infoQ | Bernd Rücker | A collaborative approach for real-world BPM |
| 10-2009 | JavaMagazin | Bernd Rücker, Falko Menge | JBoss jBPM 4 |
| 09-2009 | JavaMagazin | Bernd Rücker, Jörg Moldenhauer | Prozessinformationssystem mit jBPM bei der 1&1 |
| 09-2008 | JavaMagazin | Bernd Rücker | jBPM meets ESB |
| 06-2008 | JavaMagazin | Bernd Rücker | Business Process Simulation in Action |
| 05-2008 | JavaMagazin | Bernd Rücker | Business Process Simulation selbst gemacht |
| 02-2008 | Master Thesis | Bernd Rücker | Building an open source Business Process Simulation tool with JBoss jBPM |












